此 MCP 可以做什么
Provides verified status, pricing, sentiment, alternatives, and viability information for thousands of AI tools.
功能
工具
11
工具
category_landscape
The risk landscape of an AI tool category
Use this when the user asks what a whole category of AI tools looks like â how crowded it is, how healthy or risky it is overall, which tools in it are strongest, or which are in trouble. Examples: "how risky is the AI video generation market", "what does the code assistant category look like". Returns the number of tools we track in that category, how they distribute across survival bands, the category's vendor-link decay rate, and named examples at both the strongest and weakest ends â each with its own survival score and the date our record of it was last rebuilt. Categories are our own classification and tools belong to several at once, so category sizes overlap and never sum to the catalog total. Bands classify risk, not quality â the model has no notion of company size. Not for: choosing between named tools (use compare_tools), finding a tool for a job (use recommend_tools), or market-wide mortality statistics (use deadpool_digest).
只读
输入模式
{'type': 'object', '$schema': 'https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema', 'required': ['category'], 'properties': {'category': {'type': 'string', 'maxLength': 80, 'minLength': 2, 'description': 'The category, in plain words or as a slug â\x80\x94 e.g. "image generation", "code-development".'}, 'response_format': {'enum': ['concise', 'detailed'], 'type': 'string', 'default': 'concise', 'description': 'concise = size, distribution and the strongest few. detailed = adds the weakest end and the decay rate.'}}}
check_tool_status
Check if an AI tool is alive
Use this when the user asks whether a specific AI tool is alive, dead, shut down, still maintained, safe to adopt, or trustworthy â or asks for its current health, viability, or verification status. Returns a verified verdict (healthy / monitor / at-risk / shut down / delisted) with evidence: link-health probe results, a 5-signal viability assessment, real-user market sentiment, pricing reality, and verified-alive alternatives. Data comes from the RightAIChoice verification engine: 8,000+ AI tools with every vendor link re-probed on a rolling weekly cycle. Every answer states BOTH dates it stands on and does not merge them: when we last probed the vendor links (what the verdict is built on) and when our catalog record was last rebuilt. Not for: tools outside the AI/software space, historical company research, or legal/financial advice. "Not in the catalog" and a verdict of UNKNOWN are DIFFERENT answers: the first means we hold no entry, the second means we hold one whose signals are not measured yet. Neither is evidence the tool is dead.
只读
输入模式
{'type': 'object', '$schema': 'https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema', 'required': ['tool'], 'properties': {'tool': {'anyOf': [{'type': 'string', 'maxLength': 120, 'minLength': 1}, {'type': 'array', 'items': {'type': 'string', 'maxLength': 120, 'minLength': 1}, 'maxItems': 20, 'minItems': 1}], 'description': 'The AI tool to check â\x80\x94 product name (e.g. "Jasper") or site slug (e.g. "jasper"). Pass an ARRAY of up to 20 names to assess a whole stack at once.'}, 'response_format': {'enum': ['concise', 'detailed'], 'type': 'string', 'default': 'concise', 'description': 'concise = verdict + freshness + source link. detailed = adds viability signals, link health, sentiment, pricing, and alternatives.'}}}
compare_tools
Compare two AI tools head-to-head
Use this when the user asks how two specific AI tools compare, which of two tools to choose, or "X vs Y". Returns live verification status for BOTH tools side by side (alive/at-risk/shut-down verdict, the vendor-link probe date AND the separate catalog-rebuild date, pricing reality, market sentiment) plus an editorial head-to-head verdict when a reviewed comparison exists for the pair. Data comes from the RightAIChoice verification engine: 8,000+ AI tools with every vendor link re-probed on a rolling weekly cycle, and 19,000+ maintained comparison analyses. Not for: single-tool checks (use check_tool_status), comparing more than two tools, or category browsing. If either tool is reported as not in the catalog, that is not evidence it is dead.
只读
输入模式
{'type': 'object', '$schema': 'https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema', 'required': ['tool_a', 'tool_b'], 'properties': {'tool_a': {'type': 'string', 'maxLength': 120, 'minLength': 1, 'description': 'First AI tool â\x80\x94 product name (e.g. "Jasper") or site slug (e.g. "jasper").'}, 'tool_b': {'type': 'string', 'maxLength': 120, 'minLength': 1, 'description': 'Second AI tool â\x80\x94 product name or site slug.'}, 'response_format': {'enum': ['concise', 'detailed'], 'type': 'string', 'default': 'concise', 'description': 'concise = per-tool verdict + pricing + editorial verdict. detailed = adds sentiment, viability signals, and link health per tool.'}}}
deadpool_digest
AI tool mortality statistics
Use this when the user asks how many AI tools die, AI startup failure or shutdown rates, which AI categories decay fastest, how risky the AI tool market is, or for data behind "most AI tools fail" claims. Returns two clearly separated datasets: (1) LIVE catalog decay â 8,000+ verified AI tools with broken vendor-link rates, dead-homepage counts, pricing opacity, and the fastest/slowest-decaying categories, updated daily; (2) a FROZEN dated survival study of 2,291 top Product Hunt launches (of the 2,066 with a determinable outcome, 24.4% are dead within ~2 years). Every figure carries its as-of date. Data comes from the RightAIChoice verification engine; link-decay figures count only VENDOR-published links (site/docs/changelog/repo), never our own derived URLs. Not for: checking one specific tool (use check_tool_status) or predicting a specific tool's future (use viability_score). Decay rates describe categories and cohorts, not individual products.
只读
输入模式
{'type': 'object', '$schema': 'https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema', 'properties': {'response_format': {'enum': ['concise', 'detailed'], 'type': 'string', 'default': 'concise', 'description': 'concise = headline mortality figures from both datasets. detailed = adds fastest/slowest-decaying categories and survival splits by launch votes and rank.'}}}
find_alternatives
Find verified-alive alternatives to an AI tool
Use this when the user asks what to use instead of a specific AI tool, for its alternatives or competitors, or for a replacement because the tool shut down, got acquired, raised prices, or is unreliable. Returns up to 3 verified-alive alternatives from the same category, each with a one-line description, current health verdict, the date our record of it was last rebuilt, and pricing model. If the asked-about tool shut down, says so (with the recorded reason) and returns live replacements. Alternatives come from the RightAIChoice verification engine (8,000+ AI tools, every vendor link re-probed on a rolling weekly cycle), ranked by category and identity-tag match â never filler from unrelated categories. The response states whether results are curated matches or a category roll-up. Not for: comparing two named tools (use compare_tools) or checking a single tool's status (use check_tool_status).
只读
输入模式
{'type': 'object', '$schema': 'https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema', 'required': ['tool'], 'properties': {'tool': {'type': 'string', 'maxLength': 120, 'minLength': 1, 'description': 'The AI tool to find alternatives for â\x80\x94 product name (e.g. "Jasper") or site slug (e.g. "jasper").'}}}
market_sentiment
Real-user market sentiment for an AI tool
Use this when the user asks what people actually think of a specific AI tool, whether users like it, its reputation, reviews, community feedback, common complaints, or praised strengths. Returns a synthesized sentiment report from real user discussions (Reddit, Hacker News, GitHub, YouTube, Product Hunt and more): overall sentiment label, per-source positivity, top pros and cons, recurring themes, and mention volume â always stamped with the scan date. Reports come from the RightAIChoice sentiment engine and are served from the verified cache (usability gate: completed scans under 180 days old). If no usable scan is on file, this tool says so honestly instead of guessing. SUBJECT GATE: where we hold a scan but cannot establish that the posts are about this product rather than something else sharing its name, NO score, count or breakdown is returned and the reply says so explicitly. That reply means "we checked and disproved the subject" â it is not an absence of data and not a negative signal about the product. Not for: checking whether a tool is alive (use check_tool_status) or head-to-head choices (use compare_tools). Sentiment reflects public discussion volume, not product quality rankings.
只读
输入模式
{'type': 'object', '$schema': 'https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema', 'required': ['tool'], 'properties': {'tool': {'type': 'string', 'maxLength': 120, 'minLength': 1, 'description': 'The AI tool to get sentiment for â\x80\x94 product name (e.g. "Jasper") or site slug (e.g. "jasper").'}, 'response_format': {'enum': ['concise', 'detailed'], 'type': 'string', 'default': 'concise', 'description': 'concise = label, verdict line, top pro/con, mention count. detailed = adds per-source breakdown, up to 4 pros/cons, and recurring themes.'}}}
pricing_reality
What an AI tool really costs
Use this when the user asks what a specific AI tool costs, its pricing model, plans and tiers, whether it has a free tier, hidden costs, or whether the vendor even publishes prices. Returns the recorded pricing model, per-plan prices exactly as the vendor lists them, and â unique to this catalog â documented HIDDEN COSTS: annual-commitment markups, seat minimums, paywalled features, and undisclosed usage fees. Data comes from the RightAIChoice verification engine (8,000+ AI tools re-verified on a rolling weekly cycle). The response distinguishes "the vendor publishes no prices" (their choice â sales call required) from "not recorded in our catalog" (our gap), and never converts currencies. Not for: negotiating quotes, historical price tracking, or financial advice. Prices change frequently â treat the verification date as part of the answer.
只读
输入模式
{'type': 'object', '$schema': 'https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema', 'required': ['tool'], 'properties': {'tool': {'type': 'string', 'maxLength': 120, 'minLength': 1, 'description': 'The AI tool to get pricing for â\x80\x94 product name (e.g. "Jasper") or site slug (e.g. "jasper").'}, 'response_format': {'enum': ['concise', 'detailed'], 'type': 'string', 'default': 'concise', 'description': 'concise = pricing model + plan prices + top 2 hidden costs. detailed = full plan list with key features and up to 6 hidden costs.'}}}
recommend_tools
Find an AI tool for a job â that will still exist next year
Use this when the user describes what they need an AI tool to DO rather than naming one â "something to transcribe interviews", "an image generator with an API", "a writing tool for a small team". Returns a verified shortlist matched on the described need, filtered by constraints the caller sets, and â unique to this catalog â screened against a survival bar: tools failing our link-health probes or scoring badly on the 5-signal viability model can be excluded outright. Each result carries its own health verdict, the date our record of it was last rebuilt, and pricing model. Matching is keyword and fuzzy text search over 8,000+ verified tools; the response states this. Tools with no viability measurement yet are listed separately by name rather than silently dropped. Not for: questions about a tool the user already named (use check_tool_status), head-to-head choices (use compare_tools), or filtering by price amount â prices are recorded verbatim in mixed currencies and are never converted or compared numerically.
只读
输入模式
{'type': 'object', '$schema': 'https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema', 'required': ['need'], 'properties': {'need': {'type': 'string', 'maxLength': 300, 'minLength': 3, 'description': 'What the tool must do, in the user\'s own words. e.g. "transcribe podcast interviews with speaker labels".'}, 'limit': {'type': 'integer', 'default': 5, 'maximum': 10, 'minimum': 1, 'description': 'How many results to return (max 10).'}, 'requires_api': {'type': 'boolean', 'default': False, 'description': 'Only return tools recorded as offering an API.'}, 'survival_bar': {'enum': ['none', 'exclude_at_risk', 'safe_bet_only'], 'type': 'string', 'default': 'exclude_at_risk', 'description': 'exclude_at_risk = drop tools scoring below the at-risk threshold, with a failing main site, or whose published website now redirects to a different company. safe_bet_only = only the strongest band. none = no survival screening (moved-identity tools are then returned WITH the move stated).'}, 'pricing_model': {'enum': ['any', 'free', 'freemium', 'paid', 'has_free_option'], 'type': 'string', 'default': 'any', 'description': 'Filter by recorded pricing model. has_free_option = free or freemium. There is no price-amount filter: prices are verbatim strings in mixed currencies.'}, 'exclude_wrappers': {'type': 'boolean', 'default': False, 'description': 'Exclude tools assessed as thin wrappers around a third-party model.'}}}
stack_overlap
Where an AI tool stack overlaps with itself
Use this when the user asks whether the AI tools they pay for duplicate each other â "are we paying twice", "does our stack overlap", "can we consolidate these". Give it the tools they actually pay for. Returns the pairs we classify the same way, with the shared categories and shared capability tags named for each pair so the user can judge the claim themselves. IMPORTANT: this compares how RightAIChoice classifies two products â not their features, their APIs, or what a team does with them. It is a prompt to review a pair, never evidence that either is redundant. It never recommends cancelling anything and never totals cost, because plan and seat count are unknown. Not for: feature-by-feature comparison of two named tools (use compare_tools), finding a replacement (use find_alternatives), or calculating spend.
只读
输入模式
{'type': 'object', '$schema': 'https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema', 'required': ['tools'], 'properties': {'tools': {'type': 'array', 'items': {'type': 'string', 'maxLength': 120, 'minLength': 1}, 'maxItems': 15, 'minItems': 2, 'description': 'The tools the team pays for â\x80\x94 product names or slugs. Between 2 and 15.'}, 'response_format': {'enum': ['concise', 'detailed'], 'type': 'string', 'default': 'concise', 'description': 'concise = overlapping pairs only. detailed = also lists pairs we found no overlap between.'}}}
viability_score
How likely an AI tool is to survive
Use this when the user asks whether a specific AI tool is safe to adopt or build on, likely to still exist next year, well-maintained, gaining or losing momentum â or asks about its long-term viability or abandonment risk. Returns a viability BAND (safe bet / moderate / at risk) with the five measured drivers behind it: what the vendor publishes, site health, traction, user sentiment, and recent activity â plus which signal is weakest and why, in plain language. Assessments come from the RightAIChoice verification engine (8,000+ AI tools, every vendor link re-probed on a rolling weekly cycle). A null driver means "not yet measured", which is different from a bad score. Bands are NOT a leaderboard: they classify risk, they do not rank tools against each other. Not for: comparing two tools (use compare_tools), liveness checks alone (use check_tool_status), or investment decisions.
只读
输入模式
{'type': 'object', '$schema': 'https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema', 'required': ['tool'], 'properties': {'tool': {'type': 'string', 'maxLength': 120, 'minLength': 1, 'description': 'The AI tool to assess â\x80\x94 product name (e.g. "Jasper") or site slug (e.g. "jasper").'}}}
whats_changed
What changed in the AI tool market
Use this when the user asks what has changed recently in AI tools â whether a specific tool has changed its pricing, links, domain or health, or what has moved across the market since a given date. Returns dated, field-level changes we actually observed: vendor pricing-page edits, recorded price changes, link health moving, domain and certificate changes, and vendors moving their site. Each carries the date we observed it and how. Reports only VENDOR-OBSERVABLE changes by default â our own editorial rewrites are excluded and the response says so, because our writing changing is not the market moving. Our change record begins on a fixed date stated in every answer; asking about an earlier period returns that date rather than an empty result. Not for: predicting future changes, or a tool's current status (use check_tool_status).
只读
输入模式
{'type': 'object', '$schema': 'https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema', 'properties': {'tool': {'type': 'string', 'maxLength': 120, 'minLength': 1, 'description': 'Optional. A single AI tool â\x80\x94 product name or slug. Omit for a market-wide summary.'}, 'since': {'type': 'string', 'maxLength': 30, 'description': 'Optional ISO date (YYYY-MM-DD). Defaults to 7 days ago. Earlier than our coverage floor returns the floor.'}, 'include': {'enum': ['vendor_changes', 'vendor_and_our_assessment'], 'type': 'string', 'default': 'vendor_changes', 'description': 'vendor_changes = only what the vendor did. vendor_and_our_assessment = also our survival re-scores. Our editorial rewrites are never included.'}, 'response_format': {'enum': ['concise', 'detailed'], 'type': 'string', 'default': 'concise', 'description': 'concise = counts plus the most notable changes. detailed = the individual dated changes.'}}}
历史
近期工具变更
已添加
stack_overlap
2026年9月29日 03:02
已添加
category_landscape
2026年9月17日 12:37
已添加
recommend_tools
2026年9月17日 12:37
已添加
whats_changed
2026年9月17日 12:37
已添加
pricing_reality
2026年9月17日 12:37
已添加
viability_score
2026年9月17日 12:37
已添加
deadpool_digest
2026年9月17日 12:37
已添加
market_sentiment
2026年9月17日 12:37
已添加
find_alternatives
2026年9月17日 12:37
已添加
compare_tools
2026年9月17日 12:37
已添加
check_tool_status
2026年9月17日 12:37
发现
类似的 MCP 服务器
LiveDataLink
io.github.blackboxfoundry/livedatalink
Exposes public-data tools covering economics, labor, banking, transport, books, legal opinions, carriers, environmental data, and…
Stratalize Healthcare
com.stratalize/healthcare
Retired Stratalize server exposing benchmark, market intelligence, compliance, financial, healthcare, legal, real estate, and eco…
Stratalize Governance
com.stratalize/governance
Retired Stratalize server exposing benchmark, market intelligence, compliance, financial, healthcare, legal, real estate, and eco…
Stratalize Oracle
com.stratalize/oracle
Retired Stratalize server exposing benchmark, market intelligence, compliance, financial, healthcare, legal, real estate, and eco…
Stratalize Real Estate
com.stratalize/realestate
Retired Stratalize server exposing benchmark, market intelligence, compliance, financial, healthcare, legal, real estate, and eco…
Stratalize Crypto & DeFi
com.stratalize/crypto
Retired Stratalize server exposing benchmark, market intelligence, compliance, financial, healthcare, legal, real estate, and eco…
Valuein — SEC EDGAR Fundamentals & Smart-Money Data
io.github.valuein/mcp-sec-edgar
Provides point-in-time SEC EDGAR fundamentals, filings, ownership signals, financial analysis, valuation models, research reports…
equibles
io.github.daniel3303/equibles
Provides equity and market research tools covering SEC filings, company financials, portfolios, prices, options, macroeconomic da…